Area under the curve, (standard error), and are as follows: 0.87, (0.05). From the empirical analysis, 80.3% of individuals were correctly classified.
Optimal cut-off for the scale determined by sensitivity and specificity analyses is a combined score of 15.
Other information about tool (e.g., additional psychometrics ) If validated, what was the gold standard?Īssessed using convergent validity by comparing depression severity scores with severity in dysfunction (functional impairment scores)ĭescription of other development procedures, if applicable This scale is designed to be delivered to new mothers. Tool was developed and tested among women seeking antenatal care at the Kingasani Maternity Clinic in the Kinshasa region of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Subpopulation in which tool was developed/validated (e.g., tool was developed and tested among middle-class women)? Language(s) of the adapted/developed/validated tool Hopkins Symptom Checklist- Depression ScaleĬountry or countries where tool was developed/adapted/validated Mental health assessment tool that was adapted/developed/validated Other means of contacting author (e.g., website,, ResearchGate) Last Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
0 kommentar(er)
